Gudino v. Oasis Outsourcing
31 FLW D1666
Competent and substantial evidence supported JCC’s determination that mediation settlement agreement was intended as a full settlement of case and accordingly, the settlement agreement was enforceable. The JCC only enforced the terms of the mediation settlement agreement and nothing else. Compare Hale v. Shear Express, Inc., d/b/a Hair Express, 31 FLW D1666, in which the court found that the parties had never reached an agreement on all essential terms of the settlement and accordingly, it was error for the JCC to enforce the settlement terms.