Eberli v. Cirrus Design Corp.
615 F. Supp. 2d 1369 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (May)
The district court held that three expert witnesses’ opinion were not admissible because the process they used was not sufficient under the Daubert test. The first expert’s testimony showed that he relied primarily on tests conducted by another doctor and on that doctor’s opinions in coming to his own conclusions. As for the other two expert’s, many of their conclusions were found to be little more than mere speculation. Based on this, the district court excluded their testimony.