Workers' Compensation

Listed below is McConnaughhay, Coonrod, Pope, Weaver & Stern, P.A.'s workers' compensation case law database. The database dates back until 1971 and includes over 5500 workers' compensation court decisions.

To view the case summaries, select one of the general topics listed below.


Closet Maid v. Sykes (en banc)

25 FLW D459

Treating physician testified the claimant's need for surgery was 75% related to a preexisting condition and 25% related to an on-the-job accident. Prior to compensable accident, claimant had been asymptomatic in regards to his pre-existing congenital back condition. Based on the entirety of the evidence, including medical and non-medical testimony, JCC ruled that accident on-the-job was the major contributing cause of the claimant's need for medical care. Benefits were accordingly awarded. On appeal, court determined that there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of major contributing cause but remanded case to JCC to ensure that judge's decision was in accordance with law announced in this en banc decision. In defining "major contributing cause," the court determined that the workplace accident must be greater than any other cause contributing to the disability or need for treatment. There is no requirement that the industrial accident must account for more than 50% of the resulting injuries. Instead, the workplace accident must be greater in significance than any other single cause. The finding of major contributing cause can be supported by medical or lay testimony, or both, depending on the circumstances involved. In some cases, the connection between the accident and the injury may be so clear that there is no need for medical proof. For example, if a claimant has a head trauma and suffers organic brain damage. To the contrary, medical evidence may be essential when the circumstances do not permit causation to be determined by observation. For example, when the question arises as to the causal relationship between an on-the-job accident and psychiatric problems. The question of major contributing cause is an issue of fact and the judge's decision in this regard is reviewable on appeal based on the competent and substantial evidence test. Concurring opinions and dissenting opinions. Miami-Dade County v. Mitchell, 754 So.2d 773 (1st DCA 2000).