Cases

Competent and substantial evidence supported the JCC’s decision that psychiatric or psychological care was not causally related to claimant’s industrial injury. Claimant did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that he required such treatment that was related to the compensable accident. Because the appellate court is not permitted to reweigh the evidence or substitute its judgment for that of the JCC, and the JCC’s findings were supported by competent and substantial evidence, court affirmed JCC’s order. Case remanded to JCC to determine permanent physical impairment rating. Judge’s order indicated that claimant was at MMI with an impairment rating of either 12% or 14%, entitling claimant to a total of 36 weeks or 42 weeks of impairment benefits. Appellate court could not determine which permanent physical impairment rating was accurate.